Show simple item record

Srovnání průběhových tvarů v albánštině a angličtině
dc.contributor.advisorKlégr, Aleš
dc.creatorBorshi, Orkida
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-03T08:56:42Z
dc.date.available2017-04-03T08:56:42Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/9053
dc.description.abstractNazev teto prace Srovnanf prubehovych tvaru v angliCtine a albanstine napovida, ze jde 0 studii srovnavaci. Byla rozdelena do dvou vetsich celku, do casti teoreticke a vYzkumne. Cilem teoretickeho useku bylo provest pfehled poznatku zminovanych v lingvisticke literatufe 0 prubehovych formach, jejich funkci, vYvoji, semantice a uziti, a to jak pro albanstinu, tak i pro anglictinu. Cast prakticka pak na zaklade tohoto popisneho aparatu sleduje podrobne dye dvojice pfekladovych textu (Alb > Eng a Eng > Alb). K realizaci teto casti bylo potfeba excerpovat celkem 200 polozek, vzdy 100 z kazdeho vychoziho jazyka. Nicmene v Alb-Eng textu bylo dohromady nalezeno pouze 74 prubehovych tvaru, z cehoz vyplyva, ze z Eng-Alb verze jsme vybrali 126 pfikladu, aby potfebny pocet byl dorovnan. Z teoreticke casti jiz bylo zrejme, ze prubehove tvary se objevuji jak v anglickem jazyce tak i v jazyce albanskem. V anglictine, jak znamo, se tvofi pomoci slovesa bYt - to be + -ing tvaru lexikalniho slovesa. Pro albanstinujsme dokonce objevi1r formy dYe, a to po + finitni slovesny tvar nebo konstrukcijam + duke + pfitomne pficesti lexikalniho slovesa. Postup, ktery byl zvolen pro sestaveni jejich popisneho aparatu, je nasledujici. Jako prvni pfisly na fadu anglicke prubehove formy, ktere byly popsany z vetSi miry z hlediska vYvoje,...cs_CZ
dc.description.abstractOn a very general level we can say that the results of the Project Research support the claims made by the authors of the surveyed literature in the Theoretical Overview, i.e., that the progressive forms in Albanian really exist. However, our research has qualified the observations on Albanian progressive constructions in the literature in one important respect: it has, perhaps surprisingly, shown that the po-constructions (in spite of their restriction to the present and imperfect) rather than the jam + duke forms are by far the more common of these two formal means of expressing progressiveness in Albanian. The prevalence of the po-constructions over the duke ones is surprising because the present/imperfect tense restrictions of the po-constructions are not the only ones. Other tenses are not allowed to combine with the po-constructions for diverse reasons (the preterite because of its terminative nature, the future tense because of the particles do te and the impossibility of po to combine with other particles before the verb). Another limitation that appeared in both parts ofthis study is the impossibility of the progressive po particle to accompany verbs denoting repetition or habit. If we were to speculate on the reasons for the prevalence of the po-constructions over the duke ones, we suppose that it...en_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.titleA comparison of progressive forms in English and Albanianen_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2007
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-05-23
dc.description.departmentÚstav anglistiky a amerikanistikycs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFilozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Artsen_US
dc.identifier.repId50766
dc.title.translatedSrovnání průběhových tvarů v albánštině a angličtiněcs_CZ
dc.contributor.refereeMalá, Markéta
dc.identifier.aleph000637681
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelmagisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineAnglistika - amerikanistika - Francouzštinacs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineEnglish and American Studies - French Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.programHumanitiesen_US
thesis.degree.programHumanitní studiacs_CZ
uk.thesis.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csFilozofická fakulta::Ústav anglistiky a amerikanistikycs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.csFilozofická fakultacs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Artsen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFFcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csAnglistika - amerikanistika - Francouzštinacs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enEnglish and American Studies - French Studiesen_US
uk.degree-program.csHumanitní studiacs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enHumanitiesen_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.csNazev teto prace Srovnanf prubehovych tvaru v angliCtine a albanstine napovida, ze jde 0 studii srovnavaci. Byla rozdelena do dvou vetsich celku, do casti teoreticke a vYzkumne. Cilem teoretickeho useku bylo provest pfehled poznatku zminovanych v lingvisticke literatufe 0 prubehovych formach, jejich funkci, vYvoji, semantice a uziti, a to jak pro albanstinu, tak i pro anglictinu. Cast prakticka pak na zaklade tohoto popisneho aparatu sleduje podrobne dye dvojice pfekladovych textu (Alb > Eng a Eng > Alb). K realizaci teto casti bylo potfeba excerpovat celkem 200 polozek, vzdy 100 z kazdeho vychoziho jazyka. Nicmene v Alb-Eng textu bylo dohromady nalezeno pouze 74 prubehovych tvaru, z cehoz vyplyva, ze z Eng-Alb verze jsme vybrali 126 pfikladu, aby potfebny pocet byl dorovnan. Z teoreticke casti jiz bylo zrejme, ze prubehove tvary se objevuji jak v anglickem jazyce tak i v jazyce albanskem. V anglictine, jak znamo, se tvofi pomoci slovesa bYt - to be + -ing tvaru lexikalniho slovesa. Pro albanstinujsme dokonce objevi1r formy dYe, a to po + finitni slovesny tvar nebo konstrukcijam + duke + pfitomne pficesti lexikalniho slovesa. Postup, ktery byl zvolen pro sestaveni jejich popisneho aparatu, je nasledujici. Jako prvni pfisly na fadu anglicke prubehove formy, ktere byly popsany z vetSi miry z hlediska vYvoje,...cs_CZ
uk.abstract.enOn a very general level we can say that the results of the Project Research support the claims made by the authors of the surveyed literature in the Theoretical Overview, i.e., that the progressive forms in Albanian really exist. However, our research has qualified the observations on Albanian progressive constructions in the literature in one important respect: it has, perhaps surprisingly, shown that the po-constructions (in spite of their restriction to the present and imperfect) rather than the jam + duke forms are by far the more common of these two formal means of expressing progressiveness in Albanian. The prevalence of the po-constructions over the duke ones is surprising because the present/imperfect tense restrictions of the po-constructions are not the only ones. Other tenses are not allowed to combine with the po-constructions for diverse reasons (the preterite because of its terminative nature, the future tense because of the particles do te and the impossibility of po to combine with other particles before the verb). Another limitation that appeared in both parts ofthis study is the impossibility of the progressive po particle to accompany verbs denoting repetition or habit. If we were to speculate on the reasons for the prevalence of the po-constructions over the duke ones, we suppose that it...en_US
uk.publication.placePrahacs_CZ
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta, Ústav anglistiky a amerikanistikycs_CZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV