Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.advisorRiegl, Martin
dc.creatorSemenov, Andrej
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-26T16:38:42Z
dc.date.available2017-05-26T16:38:42Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/64163
dc.description.abstractDid Kosovo have right to secede? What was the cause of conflict in Kosovo? How important is Kosovo for international community? This thesis addresses these issues as it seeks, above all, to answer the question - Is Kosovo a sovereign, unrecognized, or failed state? To do so, the chapter I explores critically the definitions of sovereign, unrecognized, and failed states. The chapter I argues that Kosovo does not have full control over the territory it claims, but with help of the international offices this problem has been overcome. On the other hand, the main obstacle to international recognition and full sovereignty is Serbia (parent state), claiming that Kosovo is part of its territory. Therefore, the theories of secession are analyzed in-depth in order to answer whether Kosovo can obtain the missing part of sovereignty without a parent state. The main argument for Kosovo's secession is extensive violence in 1990's, therefore chapter II scrutinizes the history of political violence in Kosovo, showing that Kosovo's secession has its roots in creation of Greater Albania and alleged violation of human rights can be only the trigger but not the cause of the secession. Chapter III assesses the debate of Serbia's sovereignty/integrity versus Kosovo's right to self-determination. This chapter at first...en_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.subjectKosovocs_CZ
dc.subjectinternational recognitioncs_CZ
dc.subjectterritorial sovereigntycs_CZ
dc.subjectparent statecs_CZ
dc.subjectKosovoen_US
dc.subjectinternational recognitionen_US
dc.subjectterritorial sovereigntyen_US
dc.subjectparent stateen_US
dc.titleKosovo: Sovereign, Unrecognized or Failed State?en_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2015
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-06-22
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Political Scienceen_US
dc.description.departmentKatedra politologiecs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.repId151448
dc.contributor.refereeLandovský, Jakub
dc.identifier.aleph002016244
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelnavazující magisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineMezinárodní ekonomická a politická studiacs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineInternational Economic and Political Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.programMezinárodní ekonomická a politická studiacs_CZ
thesis.degree.programInternational Economic and Political Studiesen_US
uk.thesis.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csFakulta sociálních věd::Katedra politologiecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Social Sciences::Department of Political Scienceen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFSVcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csMezinárodní ekonomická a politická studiacs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enInternational Economic and Political Studiesen_US
uk.degree-program.csMezinárodní ekonomická a politická studiacs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enInternational Economic and Political Studiesen_US
thesis.grade.csVelmi dobřecs_CZ
thesis.grade.enVery gooden_US
uk.abstract.enDid Kosovo have right to secede? What was the cause of conflict in Kosovo? How important is Kosovo for international community? This thesis addresses these issues as it seeks, above all, to answer the question - Is Kosovo a sovereign, unrecognized, or failed state? To do so, the chapter I explores critically the definitions of sovereign, unrecognized, and failed states. The chapter I argues that Kosovo does not have full control over the territory it claims, but with help of the international offices this problem has been overcome. On the other hand, the main obstacle to international recognition and full sovereignty is Serbia (parent state), claiming that Kosovo is part of its territory. Therefore, the theories of secession are analyzed in-depth in order to answer whether Kosovo can obtain the missing part of sovereignty without a parent state. The main argument for Kosovo's secession is extensive violence in 1990's, therefore chapter II scrutinizes the history of political violence in Kosovo, showing that Kosovo's secession has its roots in creation of Greater Albania and alleged violation of human rights can be only the trigger but not the cause of the secession. Chapter III assesses the debate of Serbia's sovereignty/integrity versus Kosovo's right to self-determination. This chapter at first...en_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.publication.placePrahacs_CZ
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Katedra politologiecs_CZ
dc.identifier.lisID990020162440106986


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV