Zobrazit minimální záznam

EU regulace umělé inteligence: rámec a diskuze
dc.contributor.advisorKołodziej, Jacek
dc.creatorTolepbergen, Miras
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-07T20:39:02Z
dc.date.available2023-11-07T20:39:02Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/186201
dc.description.abstractThe research aims to examine how and to what extent the media, outlets that are perceived as the most influential by the EU decision-makers in Brussels, translate the European Commission's, the main promoter, discourse on AI regulation. And pertinent question is: how does the media's discourse relate to the Commission's institutional discourse on AI regulation? To answer it, the research relies on framing theory to offer an analysis of frames produced and disseminated by the media and the Commission. A comparative study provided not only a description of certain types of frames disseminated by both actors but also explored their relationship and interaction. Overall, it was concluded that even though the Commission's frames are present in the media's discourse, they are not replicated because other factors, including journalists' perspective and caution about powerful and yet mysterious technology, might have influenced significantly their media framing of the AI regulation issue. Thus, the media frame setting process's main logic was illustrated.en_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.titleEuropean Union Artificial Intelligence Regulation: framework and discussionen_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2023
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-09-20
dc.description.departmentKatedra evropských studiícs_CZ
dc.description.departmentDepartment of European Studiesen_US
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
dc.description.facultyFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.identifier.repId259189
dc.title.translatedEU regulace umělé inteligence: rámec a diskuzecs_CZ
dc.contributor.refereeTomalová, Eliška
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelnavazující magisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmecs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmeen_US
thesis.degree.programEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmeen_US
thesis.degree.programEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmecs_CZ
uk.thesis.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csFakulta sociálních věd::Katedra evropských studiícs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Social Sciences::Department of European Studiesen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFSVcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmecs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmeen_US
uk.degree-program.csEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmecs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmeen_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.enThe research aims to examine how and to what extent the media, outlets that are perceived as the most influential by the EU decision-makers in Brussels, translate the European Commission's, the main promoter, discourse on AI regulation. And pertinent question is: how does the media's discourse relate to the Commission's institutional discourse on AI regulation? To answer it, the research relies on framing theory to offer an analysis of frames produced and disseminated by the media and the Commission. A comparative study provided not only a description of certain types of frames disseminated by both actors but also explored their relationship and interaction. Overall, it was concluded that even though the Commission's frames are present in the media's discourse, they are not replicated because other factors, including journalists' perspective and caution about powerful and yet mysterious technology, might have influenced significantly their media framing of the AI regulation issue. Thus, the media frame setting process's main logic was illustrated.en_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Katedra evropských studiícs_CZ
thesis.grade.codeA
uk.publication-placePrahacs_CZ
uk.thesis.defenceStatusO


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV