Zobrazit minimální záznam

Sekuritizace migrace na úrovni elit a prohlášení EU a Turecka z roku 2016
dc.contributor.advisorMcDonagh, Ken
dc.creatorFlynn, Martin Pierce
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-18T13:01:58Z
dc.date.available2023-01-18T13:01:58Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/178384
dc.description.abstractThis research project performs a discourse analysis on a corpus of speeches from Presidents of the European Commission relating to Syria from the start of the Syrian civil war in 2011 to the formulation of the 2016 EU-Turkey Statement. It addresses the following research question: In what ways has the speech of the President of the European Commission contributed to the securitization of migration resulting from the Syrian civil war? Through the use of securitization theory and leadership theory, several conclusions were drawn from the results of the discourse analysis. These included identifying a range of discursive and non-discursive practices deployed by both Barroso and Juncker to contribute to the securitization of migration into the EU. In Juncker's case, he simultaneously attempted to de-securitize the issue and pushed for policies which sought to provide a long-term de-securitized solution to the phenomenon of irregular migration into the European Union. Juncker's partial success as a transformative leader in the EU's migration and asylum seeker policy shows that the habitus of the President is influential in regard to the formulation of the EU's refugee and asylum policy. The situational-institutional context can, however, prevent the President from implementing their desired policies.en_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.titleElite Level Securitization of Migration and the 2016 EU-Turkey Statementen_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2022
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-09-14
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Security Studiesen_US
dc.description.departmentKatedra bezpečnostních studiícs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
dc.description.facultyFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.identifier.repId248998
dc.title.translatedSekuritizace migrace na úrovni elit a prohlášení EU a Turecka z roku 2016cs_CZ
dc.contributor.refereeBureš, Oldřich
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelnavazující magisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineInternational Master in Security, Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS)cs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineInternational Master in Security, Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS)en_US
thesis.degree.programInternational Master in Security, Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS)cs_CZ
thesis.degree.programInternational Master in Security, Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS)en_US
uk.thesis.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csFakulta sociálních věd::Katedra bezpečnostních studiícs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Social Sciences::Department of Security Studiesen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFSVcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csInternational Master in Security, Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS)cs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enInternational Master in Security, Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS)en_US
uk.degree-program.csInternational Master in Security, Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS)cs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enInternational Master in Security, Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS)en_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.enThis research project performs a discourse analysis on a corpus of speeches from Presidents of the European Commission relating to Syria from the start of the Syrian civil war in 2011 to the formulation of the 2016 EU-Turkey Statement. It addresses the following research question: In what ways has the speech of the President of the European Commission contributed to the securitization of migration resulting from the Syrian civil war? Through the use of securitization theory and leadership theory, several conclusions were drawn from the results of the discourse analysis. These included identifying a range of discursive and non-discursive practices deployed by both Barroso and Juncker to contribute to the securitization of migration into the EU. In Juncker's case, he simultaneously attempted to de-securitize the issue and pushed for policies which sought to provide a long-term de-securitized solution to the phenomenon of irregular migration into the European Union. Juncker's partial success as a transformative leader in the EU's migration and asylum seeker policy shows that the habitus of the President is influential in regard to the formulation of the EU's refugee and asylum policy. The situational-institutional context can, however, prevent the President from implementing their desired policies.en_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Katedra bezpečnostních studiícs_CZ
thesis.grade.codeA
uk.publication-placePrahacs_CZ
uk.thesis.defenceStatusO


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam


© 2025 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV