Zobrazit minimální záznam

Nadnárodní a mezivládní postoj k přístupovému procesu Černé hory do Evropské unie
dc.contributor.advisorWeiss, Tomáš
dc.creatorKopanicky, Marek
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-09T10:20:16Z
dc.date.available2019-07-09T10:20:16Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/107598
dc.description.abstractThe volume deals with the analysis of the relationship of the two dominant theoretical approaches of European integration - supranational and intergovernmental - towards the EU enlargement policy on the example of the accession process of Montenegro. The research goes into depth by analysing not the complex accession process as such, but the relations and attention of various European institutions and the EU member states to the particular and deliberately selected negotiation chapters of the Acquis Communautaire. The main aim of the thesis is to find out to what extent and whether at all does the behaviour of the EU institutions and its member states by the accession process correspond with the internal structure of the EU policies and competences stipulated in the EU treaties. The thesis succeeded to show that there is no reason to believe that the activities of the supranational institutions of the EU - the Commission and the Parliament - are dominant by chapter which is closely connected to the exclusive competence of the EU or that they would pay any special attention to this chapter. Similarly, there is no explicit proof that the activities of the incumbent EU member states are dominant by chapter which is closely connected to the shared competence of the EU or that they would pay any...en_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen_US
dc.subjectenlargementen_US
dc.subjectMontenegroen_US
dc.subjectaccession processen_US
dc.subjectsupranationalismen_US
dc.subjectintergovernmentalismen_US
dc.subjectAcquis Communautaireen_US
dc.subjectEurópska úniacs_CZ
dc.subjectrozširovaniecs_CZ
dc.subjectČierna Horacs_CZ
dc.subjectprístupový procescs_CZ
dc.subjectsupranacionalizmuscs_CZ
dc.subjectintergovernmentalizmuscs_CZ
dc.subjectAcquis Communautairecs_CZ
dc.titleSupranational and intergovernmental approach to the accession process of Montenegro to the European Unionen_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2019
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-06-18
dc.description.departmentKatedra evropských studiícs_CZ
dc.description.departmentDepartment of European Studiesen_US
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
dc.description.facultyFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.identifier.repId202341
dc.title.translatedNadnárodní a mezivládní postoj k přístupovému procesu Černé hory do Evropské uniecs_CZ
dc.contributor.refereeRiegl, Martin
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelnavazující magisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineMezinárodní ekonomická a politická studiacs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineInternational Economic and Political Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.programMezinárodní ekonomická a politická studiacs_CZ
thesis.degree.programInternational Economic and Political Studiesen_US
uk.thesis.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csFakulta sociálních věd::Katedra evropských studiícs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Social Sciences::Department of European Studiesen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFSVcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csMezinárodní ekonomická a politická studiacs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enInternational Economic and Political Studiesen_US
uk.degree-program.csMezinárodní ekonomická a politická studiacs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enInternational Economic and Political Studiesen_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.enThe volume deals with the analysis of the relationship of the two dominant theoretical approaches of European integration - supranational and intergovernmental - towards the EU enlargement policy on the example of the accession process of Montenegro. The research goes into depth by analysing not the complex accession process as such, but the relations and attention of various European institutions and the EU member states to the particular and deliberately selected negotiation chapters of the Acquis Communautaire. The main aim of the thesis is to find out to what extent and whether at all does the behaviour of the EU institutions and its member states by the accession process correspond with the internal structure of the EU policies and competences stipulated in the EU treaties. The thesis succeeded to show that there is no reason to believe that the activities of the supranational institutions of the EU - the Commission and the Parliament - are dominant by chapter which is closely connected to the exclusive competence of the EU or that they would pay any special attention to this chapter. Similarly, there is no explicit proof that the activities of the incumbent EU member states are dominant by chapter which is closely connected to the shared competence of the EU or that they would pay any...en_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.publication.placePrahacs_CZ
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Katedra evropských studiícs_CZ
thesis.grade.codeB


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV