Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorZaretsky, Eugen
dc.contributor.authorLange, Benjamin P.
dc.contributor.authorHey, Christiane
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-18T14:16:22Z
dc.date.available2023-12-18T14:16:22Z
dc.date.issued2023-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/187194
dc.language.isoen_UScs
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs
dc.subjectnonword repetitioncs
dc.subjectphonological short-term memorycs
dc.subjectbilingualismcs
dc.subjectlanguage assessmentcs
dc.subjectGerman phonotacticscs
dc.titleThe Assessment of Phonological Short-term Memory via “Quasi-universal” vs. Language-specific Nonwords as a Clinical Marker for Language Impairmentscs
dc.typeVědecký článekcs
dcterms.accessRightsopenAccess
dcterms.licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
uk.abstract.enBackground. In recent years, limited phonological short-term memory has become a widely recognized clinical marker for language(-related) impairments both for monolingual and bilingual children. Usually, it is assessed by the repetition of nonwords, sentences, and digit spans. However, in the case of bilingual children, its assessment has been shown to be inaccurate due to the influence of bilinguals’ first language phonotactics and their limited command of the second language. Methods. Monolingual (n = 712) and bilingual (n = 1,004) German preschoolers (age 4;0–4;11 years) were compared with each other with respect to their German language skills and performance in German-based and “quasi-universal” nonword repetition tasks (that is, items following the phonotactic rules of German vs. many world languages). Associations of both kinds of nonword repetition tasks with children’s language impairments were quantified. Results. German language skills of the bilinguals were weaker than those of the monolinguals. Whereas the bilinguals scored significantly lower than the monolinguals in German-based nonwords, there were no considerable differences between these subgroups in quasi-universal items. Poor performance in tasks employing both German-based and quasi-universal nonwords was significantly associated with language impairments. In contrast to quasi-universal nonwords, weak performance in German-based items was more strongly associated with limited German language skills than with language impairments. Conclusions. Because nonword repetition tasks were designed to identify children with language impairments, and not those with a weak command of German, quasi-universal nonwords appear to be more appropriate for language tests than language-specific items.cs
dc.publisher.publicationPlacePrahacs
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage41cs
dc.description.endPage61cs
dcterms.isPartOf.nameStudie z aplikované lingvistikycs
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2023
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2023
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue2
dcterms.isPartOf.issn2336-6702
dc.relation.isPartOfUrlhttps://studiezaplikovanelingvistiky.ff.cuni.cz


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV