Zobrazit minimální záznam

Was There a Czech Resistance to Courtly Culture? Chivalric Culture and Noble Identity in Early 14th Century Czech Texts
dc.contributor.authorMétéier, Paul-Antoine
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-28T14:58:18Z
dc.date.available2018-11-28T14:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2336-7105
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/103919
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourcePrague Papers on the History of International Relations, 2018, 1, 7-41cs_CZ
dc.source.urihttps://praguepapers.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subjectCourtly culturecs_CZ
dc.subjectchivalrycs_CZ
dc.subjectnobilitycs_CZ
dc.subjectAlexandreidacs_CZ
dc.subjectChronicle of Dalimilcs_CZ
dc.subject14th centurycs_CZ
dc.subjectBohemiacs_CZ
dc.titleUne « résistance tchèque » à la culture courtoise ? Culture chevaleresque et identité nobiliaire dans les textes tchèques du début du XIVe sièclecs_CZ
dc.title.alternativeWas There a Czech Resistance to Courtly Culture? Chivalric Culture and Noble Identity in Early 14th Century Czech Textscs_CZ
dc.typeVědecký článekcs_CZ
uk.abstract.enThe Alexandreida and the Chronicle of Dalimil, written around the beginning of the fourteenth century, are the first two substantial works of secular literature written in Czech. Both reflect the political point of view of the local nobility, and both seek to trace the boundaries of this group, using a range of criteria including language, high birth, wealth, and chivalric virtues. They are, therefore, of prime importance to examine the influence of courtly culture on the Czech nobility. Despite the ubiquity of chivalry in both these texts, they have been used as arguments in favour of the theory that the Czech society resisted courtly culture for at least half a century, preferring a “prechivalric”, “precourtly” or “noncourtly” ideal. The goal of this article is, first, to suggest that the concepts used to build such a theory do not reflect current scholarship on the history of “chivalry” “and courtliness”, and secondly, to propose that neither the Alexandreida nor the Chronicle of Dalimil reveal indisputably and unambiguously a rejection of courtly culture, if the texts are read in their entirety as opposed to isolated extracts. The conclusion is that both authors use courtly culture as a tool of distinction which differentiates the local nobility from foreigners or non-nobles.cs_CZ
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage7
dc.description.endPage41
dcterms.isPartOf.namePrague Papers on the History of International Relationscs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2018
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2018
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue1


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV