| dc.contributor | | |
| dc.creator | Tereza Jelínková | |
| dc.date | 2016 | |
| dc.date | | |
| dc.date | | |
| dc.date | | |
| dc.date | | |
| dc.date | | |
| dc.date | | |
| dc.date | | |
| dc.date | | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-28T11:04:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-05-28T11:04:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.identifier | ISSN 2336-6680 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/96686 | |
| dc.description | | |
| dc.description | | |
| dc.description | The article employs Nietzsche’s concept of creativity as the main axis of human existence in order toprovide a philosophically substantiated overview of the understanding of the position of the artist andthe arts in a society construed upon the state of crisis of the Christian-moral idea of transcendence,as it was developed in the 1940’s discourse on the arts. The topic is gradually approached from threeperspectives. The starting point is the notion of transcendence as an anthropological constant andthe notion of the artistic form as its realization. Part 2 develops the idea of an aesthetic, ‘translatingʼrelationship to the world, and finds the source of transcendence precisely in the organic characterof human existence. Part 3 then pursues the possibilities of a recovery of the complementaritybetween the profane and the sacred, which, eventually, brings about a rehabilitation of the profane and launches the dynamics of the ambivalent position of the artist in society. | |
| dc.format | | |
| dc.format | | |
| dc.format | | |
| dc.publisher | Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.relation | | |
| dc.rights | | |
| dc.rights | | |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/ | |
| dc.source | Slovo a smysl - Word & Sense, 2016, 13, 25, 62-82 | |
| dc.subject | Profánní | |
| dc.subject | posvátné | |
| dc.subject | tvořivost | |
| dc.subject | transcendence | |
| dc.subject | forma | |
| dc.subject | apollinské | |
| dc.subject | dionýské | |
| dc.subject | příroda | |
| dc.subject | tělesnost | |
| dc.subject | the profane | |
| dc.subject | the sacred | |
| dc.subject | creativity | |
| dc.subject | form | |
| dc.subject | the Apollinian | |
| dc.subject | the Dionysian | |
| dc.subject | nature | |
| dc.subject | body | |
| dc.subject | | |
| dc.subject | | |
| dc.subject | | |
| dc.subject | | |
| dc.subject | | |
| dc.subject | | |
| dc.title | Génius srdce a krize moderního umění. Organicko-estetické pojetí člověka u Friedricha Nietzscheho jako pozadí pro diskuzi o umění v Čechách čtyřicátých let | |
| dc.title | The Genius of the Heart and the Crisis of Modern Art. Friedrich Nietzsche’s Organical-Aesthetic Concept of the Human as Background for the debate on art in the Czech 1940’s | |
| dc.type | | |
| dc.type | Článek | cs_CZ |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.coverage | | |
| dc.coverage | | |
| dc.coverage | | |
| uk.internal-type | uk_publication | |
| dc.description.startPage | 62 | |
| dc.description.endPage | 82 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.name | Slovo a smysl - Word & Sense | cs_CZ |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear | 2016 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume | 13 | |
| dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue | 25 | |
