Postkoloniální střední Evropa? Kunderův „unesený Západ“ v zrcadle postkoloniální kritiky

Slačálek, Ondřej

Postcolonial Central Europe? Kundera’s ‘Kidnapped West’ in the Mirror of Postcolonial Critique

dc.contributor.author	Slačálek, Ondřej
dc.date.accessioned	2020-11-23T09:30:48Z
dc.date.available	2020-11-23T09:30:48Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.issn	2336-6680
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/123453
dc.language.iso	cs_CZ	cs_CZ
dc.publisher	Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta	cs_CZ
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.source	Slovo a smysl, 2020, 2, 105-130	cs_CZ
dc.source.uri	https://wordandsense.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subject	Postkolonialismus	cs_CZ
dc.subject	postsocialismus	cs_CZ
dc.subject	analýza světosystému	cs_CZ
dc.subject	střední Evropa	cs_CZ
dc.subject	Milan Kundera	cs_CZ
dc.subject	Maria Todorova	cs_CZ
dc.subject	Ewa Tompson	cs_CZ
dc.subject	Madina Tlostanova	cs_CZ
dc.subject	Agnes Gagyi	cs_CZ
dc.title	Postkoloniální střední Evropa? Kunderův „unesený Západ“ v zrcadle postkoloniální kritiky	cs_CZ
dc.type	Vědecký článek	cs_CZ
dc.title.translated	Postcolonial Central Europe? Kundera’s ‘Kidnapped West’ in the Mirror of Postcolonial Critique	cs_CZ
uk.abstract.en	This article has a twofold aim: 1) to introduce four theoreticians who transfer concepts of postcolonial theory to the analysis of post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe; 2) to apply these concepts to the interpretative dialogue of Milan Kundera’s essay *e Tragedy of Central Europe (1983). Te article thus presents the main concepts of the Bulgarian historian Maria Todorova (Balkanism and its similarities with and diferences to Orientalism), American-Polish literary historian and Slavicist Ewa Tompson (surrogate hegemon, Sarmatism), Russian cultural theorist Madina Tlostanova (speaking from colonial wounds), and Hungarian sociologist Agnes Gagyi. In particular, the presentation of Todorova and Tompson is complemented by the presentation of the debates caused by their work (Diana Mishkova and Rastko Močnik in Todorova’s case, Stanley Bill, Jan Sowa, Claudia SnochowskaGonzalez in Thompson’s case) and conceptual alternatives (Maria Janion). The concepts of these authors are used to demonstrate how Kundera’s essay is based on his ignorance of both non-European world and European internal peripheries, how it homogenizes Central European experiences, how it replaces politics by culture, and how it contributes to conservative identitarian positions which are not shared by Kundera in his other writings. In conclusion, the article discusses the mutual ignorance of Central European discourse and postcolonial discourse, and the possibilities of dialogue. On the meta-level the article also poses the question of how dialogue between theories of literature and political theory can enrich both participants.	cs_CZ
dc.publisher.publicationPlace	Praha	cs_CZ
uk.internal-type	uk_publication
dc.identifier.doi	10.14712/23366680.2020.2.7	cs_CZ
dc.description.startPage	105
dc.description.endPage	130
dcterms.isPartOf.name	Slovo a smysl	cs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear	2020
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume	2020
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue	2

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Název:: Ondrej_Slacalek_105-130.pdf
Velikost:: 409.6Kb
Formát:: application/pdf

Zobrazit/otevřít

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Číslo 34 [24]
Issue 34

Zobrazit minimální záznam

Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/