Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.authorVojvodík, Josef
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-25T13:02:23Z
dc.date.available2019-09-25T13:02:23Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2336-6680
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/108995
dc.language.isoencs_CZ
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourceSlovo a smysl - Word & Sense, 2019, 16, 31, 147-173cs_CZ
dc.source.urihttps://wordandsense.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subjectpathoscs_CZ
dc.subjectartistic-aesthetic thinkingcs_CZ
dc.subjectoccupation 1939–1945cs_CZ
dc.subjectRůžena Vackovács_CZ
dc.subjectPaul Ludwig Landsbergcs_CZ
dc.subjectPavel Kropáčekcs_CZ
dc.subjectPatoscs_CZ
dc.subjectumělecko-estetické myšlenícs_CZ
dc.subjectokupace 1939–1945cs_CZ
dc.subjectRůžena Vackovács_CZ
dc.titleLife in Amplitude: Pathos, Passion and Thinking on Art and Aesthetics in Occupied Prague (1939–1945)cs_CZ
dc.typeVědecký článekcs_CZ
uk.abstract.enThe study is largely concerned with the topic of pathos, affect and the pathic quality in Czech thinking about art and aesthetics in the first half of the 1940s. Consideration of pathos is here, at the same time, a reconstruction of the relationship between aesthetic and art-historical thinking about art, a reconstruction of the affective/emotional experiencing of art and the attitude to aesthetics/ethics in occupied Prague during the war years, and of the pathos of resistance to violence even at the cost of suffering and sacrifice, as represented by the art historians and theorists Růžena Vacková (1901–1982) and Pavel Kropáček (1915–1943). The study sets out from the idea of the existence of a relationship between suffering and activity, practice and pathos, passivity and passion as active forces underpinning both actions and the making of art. The Second World War constitutes a highly specific cultural and social, mental, but also emotional and affective, ‘space’ in which man was faced with extreme states and experiences that were articulated in art in a variety of modes of depiction, but also duly reflected in the theory and philosophy of art. Here reflexions of pathos, monumentality and nobility come to the fore as aesthetic (or esthetico-psychological and philosophical) categories in the theory of art, along with a pathic history of art and pathic modus vivendi of not just artists, but also art theorists, and pathos as the icono-pathic force of works of art in general.cs_CZ
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.identifier.doi10.14712/23366680.2019.1.9cs_CZ
dc.description.startPage147
dc.description.endPage173
dcterms.isPartOf.nameSlovo a smysl - Word & Sensecs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2019
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume16
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue31


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Kromě případů, kde je uvedeno jinak, licence tohoto záznamu je http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV