Show simple item record

dc.contributorFeyten, Carine M.
dc.contributorCheng Rui, Language, Literacy, and Technology Department, Nazareth College, Rochester, NY , rcheng9@naz.edu
dc.contributorFeyten Carine M., Texas Woman’s University, Denton — Dallas — Houston, TX
dc.creatorCheng, Rui
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date2015
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-28T11:05:15Z
dc.date.available2018-05-28T11:05:15Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierISSN 2336-6702
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/97203
dc.description
dc.description
dc.descriptionNon-native graduate students need to master specialized disciplinary knowledge and genre conventions to perform academic writing tasks. The learning practice is always a process of legitimate peripheral participation where students are inducted into their chosen discipline through collaboration and interaction with people in their social and academic network. Adopting a writing-to-learn perspective, the study sought to examine how teacher written feedback guided L2 graduate students to engage in legitimate, peripheral, and participatory activities with the purpose of understanding teacher expectations, learning disciplinary conventions and developing academic literacy in the discipline of applied linguistics. The exploration demonstrated that teacher written feedback provided opportunities for students to engage in dialogic interaction with various parties through interpreting and/or clarifying teacher written feedback. These legitimate peripheral participation activities not only enabled L2 students to gain necessary disciplinary knowledge for successful papers, but also situated them in relation to more experienced members and by extension to the field.
dc.formatpdf
dc.format
dc.format
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova v Praze, Filozofická fakulta
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.rights
dc.rights
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourceStudie z aplikované lingvistiky - Studies in Applied Linguistics 2015, 6, 2, 7-25
dc.subjectacademic literacy
dc.subjectapplied linguistics
dc.subjectlearning-to-write
dc.subjectlegitimate peripheral participation teacher
dc.subjectwritten feedback
dc.subjectwriting-to-learn
dc.titleL2 Students’ Academic Literacy Development Guided by Teacher Written Feedback: A Writing-to-Learn Perspective
dc.title
dc.typetext
dc.typeČlánekcs_CZ
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.coverage
dc.coverage
dc.coverage
dc.description.startPage7
dc.description.endPage25
dcterms.isPartOf.nameStudie z aplikované lingvistiky - Studies in Applied Linguisticscs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2015
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume6
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue2


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV