Dva základní analytické koncepty strukturalistického myšlení

Müller, Richard

dc.contributor	Šidák, Pavel
dc.creator	Müller, Richard
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date	2015
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date
dc.date.accessioned	2018-05-28T11:05:03Z
dc.date.available	2018-05-28T11:05:03Z
dc.date.issued	2015
dc.identifier	ISSN 2336-6729
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/97029
dc.description
dc.description
dc.description	Both texts present a systematic survey of two elementary analytical categories of Structuralist thought — binarity and opposition, especially in their semionarratological implications. In “Binarity”, one structuralist version of binary analysis is described as a decomposition “of the continuum of the observed world along universal relational axes constituting logical oppositions (contradictions). An inventory of elementary binary oppositions is established, which form a paradigmatic matrix of the observed area and structure is as a relational system or network”. Within this method an apriori aspect can be sometimes distinguished when an elementary binary logical structure is assumed as a universal principle underlying the multiplicity of observable phenomena. According to another, yet different conception, used in the context of artificial linguistic simulations and computing, binarity is understood as a principle of reversible de/composition of code based on two elementary signals or elements (formalized, for instance, as +/- or 0/1), which makes further combinatorial descriptions and operations of the system possible. The genesis of binary method, beginning with G. W. Leibniz’s binary code on one hand and Ferdinand de Saussure’s structural linguistics on the other, is followed, including Trubetzkoy’s and Jakobson’s phonology, Claude Lévi-Strauss’s ethnology, Greimas’s structural semantics and ending with the fundamental critique of binarism formulated by Jacques Derrida through his notion of différance and his descriptions of temporalization of structure. In “Opposition”, Trubetzkoy’s non-binary oppositions (gradual, equipollent, isolated, ternary, n-ary oppositions) within phonology, Greimas’s semiotic square (two types of binary oppositions: contradiction, contrariety or Mukařovský’s notions of dynamic antinomies within functionalstructuralist aesthetics are further taken into account.
dc.format	pdf
dc.format
dc.format
dc.publisher	Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Filozofická fakulta
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.relation
dc.rights
dc.rights
dc.rights	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.source	Svět literatury: Časopis pro novodobé literatury, 2015, 51, 146-155
dc.subject	opposition
dc.subject	phonology
dc.subject	structuralism
dc.subject	semiotic square
dc.subject	functional structuralist aesthetics
dc.subject	binarity
dc.subject	structural semantics
dc.subject	différance
dc.subject	binarita
dc.subject	strukturalismus
dc.subject	fonologie
dc.subject	strukturální sémantika
dc.subject	différance
dc.subject	opozice
dc.subject	sémiotický čtverec
dc.subject	funkčně-strukturální estetika
dc.title	Dva základní analytické koncepty strukturalistického myšlení
dc.title	Two Elementary Analytical Conepts of Structuralist Thought
dc.title
dc.type	article
dc.type	Článek	cs_CZ
dc.type	Article	en_US
dc.coverage
dc.coverage
dc.coverage
dc.description.startPage	146
dc.description.endPage	155
dcterms.isPartOf.name	Svět literatury: Časopis pro novodobé literatury	cs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear	2015
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume	2015
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue	51

Soubory tohoto záznamu

Název:: 1346104_richard_muller_146-155.pdf
Velikost:: 168.8Kb
Formát:: application/pdf
Popis:: Plný text

Zobrazit/otevřít

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Číslo 51 [11]
Issue 51

Zobrazit minimální záznam