Show simple item record

From Eros to Philosophy
dc.contributor.advisorKratochvíl, Zdeněk
dc.creatorHejduk, Tomáš
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-07T11:00:14Z
dc.date.available2018-03-07T11:00:14Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/95144
dc.description.abstractSummar7@issertation,,FromEros to Philosophy..,TomášHejduk) The studytries to answerthe following question:what is themeaningof thewordy'/ra in its specificusagein theconceptoffilo-sofia atthebeginningof theEuropeanculturď tradition? We answerthis questionby exploringSocrates'elaborationof the conceptof eros andhis relationto the godEros. We try to identi$ theconceptoffilia in Socrates'philosophymore precisely by displaying the conceptof eros in the sameway as it is elaboratedby this Athenianphilosopher. One of themain assetsof our work shouldlie in thecomparisonof theconventionalandnon- conventional(philosophicď)conceptionsof eros andfilia, in thesearchingfor anddescribing the differencesbetween taditional models of behaviour in ancient Greek society and Socratic-Platonicmodelsof eroticrelationshipsandits innovations.We intendto reveď how eros andthusfilia is understood1)by SocratesandPlato,i.e.by philosophers,2)by thinkers living beforeSocrates,i.e. on thefield of religion,3) by Socrates'contemporaries,regardless of them being intellectuals (Lysias, Aristophanes) or not (Xenophon). We therefore contemplatethe philosophical conceptof eros from tfueedifferentpoints of view: from the meaningof filia in the notionoffilo-sofia; from the differenceof thetraditional(religious) conception;from the differenceof the...en_US
dc.languageČeštinacs_CZ
dc.language.isocs_CZ
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Přírodovědecká fakultacs_CZ
dc.titleOD ERÓTA K FILO-SOFII Studie o E(e)rótu se zřetelem k Sókratově filosofiics_CZ
dc.typedizertační prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2007
dcterms.dateAccepted2007-02-15
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Philosophy and History of Scienceen_US
dc.description.departmentKatedra filosofie a dějin přírodních vědcs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Scienceen_US
dc.description.facultyPřírodovědecká fakultacs_CZ
dc.identifier.repId112285
dc.title.translatedFrom Eros to Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.refereePetříček, Miroslav
dc.contributor.refereeNavrátil, Martin
dc.identifier.aleph001229049
thesis.degree.namePh.D.
thesis.degree.leveldoktorskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophy of the Natural Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineFilozofie přírodních vědcs_CZ
thesis.degree.programPhilosophyen_US
thesis.degree.programFilozofiecs_CZ
uk.thesis.typedizertační prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csPřírodovědecká fakulta::Katedra filosofie a dějin přírodních vědcs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Science::Department of Philosophy and History of Scienceen_US
uk.faculty-name.csPřírodovědecká fakultacs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Scienceen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csPřFcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csFilozofie přírodních vědcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enPhilosophy of the Natural Sciencesen_US
uk.degree-program.csFilozofiecs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enPhilosophyen_US
thesis.grade.csProspělcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enPassen_US
uk.abstract.enSummar7@issertation,,FromEros to Philosophy..,TomášHejduk) The studytries to answerthe following question:what is themeaningof thewordy'/ra in its specificusagein theconceptoffilo-sofia atthebeginningof theEuropeanculturď tradition? We answerthis questionby exploringSocrates'elaborationof the conceptof eros andhis relationto the godEros. We try to identi$ theconceptoffilia in Socrates'philosophymore precisely by displaying the conceptof eros in the sameway as it is elaboratedby this Athenianphilosopher. One of themain assetsof our work shouldlie in thecomparisonof theconventionalandnon- conventional(philosophicď)conceptionsof eros andfilia, in thesearchingfor anddescribing the differencesbetween taditional models of behaviour in ancient Greek society and Socratic-Platonicmodelsof eroticrelationshipsandits innovations.We intendto reveď how eros andthusfilia is understood1)by SocratesandPlato,i.e.by philosophers,2)by thinkers living beforeSocrates,i.e. on thefield of religion,3) by Socrates'contemporaries,regardless of them being intellectuals (Lysias, Aristophanes) or not (Xenophon). We therefore contemplatethe philosophical conceptof eros from tfueedifferentpoints of view: from the meaningof filia in the notionoffilo-sofia; from the differenceof thetraditional(religious) conception;from the differenceof the...en_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.publication.placePrahacs_CZ
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Katedra filosofie a dějin přírodních vědcs_CZ
dc.identifier.lisID990012290490106986


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV