Show simple item record

Nové vyvážení v asijsko-pacifické oblasti: nové skutečnosti v tradičních aliancích USA v regionu
dc.contributor.advisorKarlas, Jan
dc.creatorDoan, Phu Nguyen
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-26T08:49:43Z
dc.date.available2020-08-26T08:49:43Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/86036
dc.description.abstractThe thesis seeks to examine the development of the US-Japan, US-South Korea, and US- Australia alliances, during the implementation of the rebalance to Asia policy under the Obama administration. It discusses the application of three major international relations theories, realism, liberalism, and constructivism, in studying the causes and effects that resulted in different outcomes across the three dyads, from security, economic, and cultural perspectives. To establish a causal relationship, the thesis employs a qualitative case study method, controlled comparison, to test the theories and identify the factors that play a decisive role in determining the differences. It then concludes that between the three alliances, it was the rational choice of policymakers, focused on state survival and economic interests, that influenced state behaviour in cross-border relationships. The US alliances in Asia-Pacific have been operating mainly on pragmatic foundations and principles, to serve strategic purposes, and have little to do with normative, ideational factors. Keywords Asia-Pacific, alliance, economic interdependence, foreign policy, hegemony, national identity, rebalance, security threaten_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.subjectAsia-Pacific|alliance|economic interdependence|foreign policy|hegemony|national identity|rebalance|security threaten_US
dc.titleAsia-Pacific Rebalance: New Realities in Traditional U.S. Alliances in the Regionen_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2017
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-06-19
dc.description.departmentKatedra mezinárodních vztahůcs_CZ
dc.description.departmentDepartment of International Relationsen_US
dc.description.facultyFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.repId179508
dc.title.translatedNové vyvážení v asijsko-pacifické oblasti: nové skutečnosti v tradičních aliancích USA v regionucs_CZ
dc.contributor.refereeDitrych, Ondřej
dc.identifier.aleph002143975
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelnavazující magisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineMezinárodní vztahycs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineInternational Relationsen_US
thesis.degree.programPolitologiecs_CZ
thesis.degree.programPolitical Scienceen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFSVcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csMezinárodní vztahycs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enInternational Relationsen_US
uk.degree-program.csPolitologiecs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enPolitical Scienceen_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.enThe thesis seeks to examine the development of the US-Japan, US-South Korea, and US- Australia alliances, during the implementation of the rebalance to Asia policy under the Obama administration. It discusses the application of three major international relations theories, realism, liberalism, and constructivism, in studying the causes and effects that resulted in different outcomes across the three dyads, from security, economic, and cultural perspectives. To establish a causal relationship, the thesis employs a qualitative case study method, controlled comparison, to test the theories and identify the factors that play a decisive role in determining the differences. It then concludes that between the three alliances, it was the rational choice of policymakers, focused on state survival and economic interests, that influenced state behaviour in cross-border relationships. The US alliances in Asia-Pacific have been operating mainly on pragmatic foundations and principles, to serve strategic purposes, and have little to do with normative, ideational factors. Keywords Asia-Pacific, alliance, economic interdependence, foreign policy, hegemony, national identity, rebalance, security threaten_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Katedra mezinárodních vztahůcs_CZ
thesis.grade.code1
uk.publication-placePrahacs_CZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV