Zobrazit minimální záznam

dc.contributor.advisorRometsch, Jens
dc.creatorErfanmanesh, Safoura
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T19:21:12Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T19:21:12Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/59376
dc.description.abstractThis master's thesis examines Adorno's concept of Utopia. Throughout this work I argue that Adorno is a utopian thinker and his conception of Utopia is a constellation or montage of negative, messianic-materialistic, formal, and individualistic definitions of Utopia. I elucidate my argument by reconstructing Adorno's conceptual constellation of Utopia in different chapters and sections of this work in the form of an interpretive constellation. In the first chapter, I explain how Utopia got lost, by investigating the causes of the failure of Enlightenment's utopian goals such as rationality, freedom, progress, and establishment of the whole society as humanity. This failure necessitates a radical reconsideration of all fundamental principles of thought and society. In chapter two I analyze Adorno's conception of negative Utopia as the determinate negation of Dystopia. His negative dialectics is the recognition of what is non-identical to thought's concepts and categories. The non-identical is the condition of the possibility of Utopia, because it indicates that there is something 'more' than what our conceptual system of knowledge can comprehend, this 'more' is the utopian. I continue this chapter by discussing Adorno's inverse theology as messianic materialism which maintains that there is no transcendent...cs_CZ
dc.description.abstractThis master's thesis examines Adorno's concept of Utopia. Throughout this work I argue that Adorno is a utopian thinker and his conception of Utopia is a constellation or montage of negative, messianic-materialistic, formal, and individualistic definitions of Utopia. I elucidate my argument by reconstructing Adorno's conceptual constellation of Utopia in different chapters and sections of this work in the form of an interpretive constellation. In the first chapter, I explain how Utopia got lost, by investigating the causes of the failure of Enlightenment's utopian goals such as rationality, freedom, progress, and establishment of the whole society as humanity. This failure necessitates a radical reconsideration of all fundamental principles of thought and society. In chapter two I analyze Adorno's conception of negative Utopia as the determinate negation of Dystopia. His negative dialectics is the recognition of what is non-identical to thought's concepts and categories. The non-identical is the condition of the possibility of Utopia, because it indicates that there is something 'more' than what our conceptual system of knowledge can comprehend, this 'more' is the utopian. I continue this chapter by discussing Adorno's inverse theology as messianic materialism which maintains that there is no transcendent...en_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta humanitních studiícs_CZ
dc.titleAdorno's Concept of Utopiaen_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2017
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-03-07
dc.description.departmentPracoviště oboru Německá a francouzská filozofiecs_CZ
dc.description.departmentDepartment of German and French Philosophyen_US
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Humanitiesen_US
dc.description.facultyFakulta humanitních studiícs_CZ
dc.identifier.repId189267
dc.contributor.refereeSepp, Hans Rainer
dc.identifier.aleph002136364
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelnavazující magisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineNěmecká a francouzská filozofie v Evropě (Eurofilozofie)cs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineGerman and French Philosophy in the European context (EuroPhilosophy)en_US
thesis.degree.programPhilosophyen_US
thesis.degree.programFilozofiecs_CZ
uk.thesis.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csFakulta humanitních studií::Pracoviště oboru Německá a francouzská filozofiecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Humanities::Department of German and French Philosophyen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFakulta humanitních studiícs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Humanitiesen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFHScs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csNěmecká a francouzská filozofie v Evropě (Eurofilozofie)cs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enGerman and French Philosophy in the European context (EuroPhilosophy)en_US
uk.degree-program.csFilozofiecs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enPhilosophyen_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.csThis master's thesis examines Adorno's concept of Utopia. Throughout this work I argue that Adorno is a utopian thinker and his conception of Utopia is a constellation or montage of negative, messianic-materialistic, formal, and individualistic definitions of Utopia. I elucidate my argument by reconstructing Adorno's conceptual constellation of Utopia in different chapters and sections of this work in the form of an interpretive constellation. In the first chapter, I explain how Utopia got lost, by investigating the causes of the failure of Enlightenment's utopian goals such as rationality, freedom, progress, and establishment of the whole society as humanity. This failure necessitates a radical reconsideration of all fundamental principles of thought and society. In chapter two I analyze Adorno's conception of negative Utopia as the determinate negation of Dystopia. His negative dialectics is the recognition of what is non-identical to thought's concepts and categories. The non-identical is the condition of the possibility of Utopia, because it indicates that there is something 'more' than what our conceptual system of knowledge can comprehend, this 'more' is the utopian. I continue this chapter by discussing Adorno's inverse theology as messianic materialism which maintains that there is no transcendent...cs_CZ
uk.abstract.enThis master's thesis examines Adorno's concept of Utopia. Throughout this work I argue that Adorno is a utopian thinker and his conception of Utopia is a constellation or montage of negative, messianic-materialistic, formal, and individualistic definitions of Utopia. I elucidate my argument by reconstructing Adorno's conceptual constellation of Utopia in different chapters and sections of this work in the form of an interpretive constellation. In the first chapter, I explain how Utopia got lost, by investigating the causes of the failure of Enlightenment's utopian goals such as rationality, freedom, progress, and establishment of the whole society as humanity. This failure necessitates a radical reconsideration of all fundamental principles of thought and society. In chapter two I analyze Adorno's conception of negative Utopia as the determinate negation of Dystopia. His negative dialectics is the recognition of what is non-identical to thought's concepts and categories. The non-identical is the condition of the possibility of Utopia, because it indicates that there is something 'more' than what our conceptual system of knowledge can comprehend, this 'more' is the utopian. I continue this chapter by discussing Adorno's inverse theology as messianic materialism which maintains that there is no transcendent...en_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta humanitních studií, Pracoviště oboru Německá a francouzská filozofiecs_CZ
thesis.grade.code1
uk.publication-placePrahacs_CZ
dc.identifier.lisID990021363640106986


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících sbírkách

Zobrazit minimální záznam


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV