Show simple item record

Maimonides: eternal vs. created universe
dc.contributor.advisorLyčka, Milan
dc.creatorKopecká, Pavlína
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-27T20:42:36Z
dc.date.available2017-04-27T20:42:36Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/38239
dc.description.abstractBakala.rski pnice analyzuje dva Maimonidovy pristupy k otazce po puvodu sveta, ktere se objevuji v jeho nejznamejsim filosofickem dile Pruvodce tapajicich. Maimonides uvadi argumenty jak pro teorii veenosti sveta, tak pro creatio ex nihilo, aniz by zaujal jednoznaene stanovisko. Cilem prace je zodpovedet otazku, jakou teorii 0 puvodu sveta Maimonides sam zastava a proe ve svem dUe ponechava v platnosti jak teze 0 stvofenosti sveta, tak teze 0 jeho vecnosti. Ukazuje se, ze oba postoje, pfestoze nejsou evidentni a jsou nedokazatelne, mohou vest ke korektnim zaverum v oblasti vfry a filozofie. Pffpadnou odpovedf na otazku, jakou teorii 0 puvodu sveta Maimonides vlastne zastava, pak muze by! i teze, ze Maimonides dd! obe pozice, protoze pro nej nepfedstavuji zadny vnitfnf rozpor.cs_CZ
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis are analyzed Maimonides's two approaches to the question about the origin of the world, appearing in his famous philosophical \vork The guide of the perplexed. Maimonides provides arguments for the theory of eternal universe and for creatio ex nihilo, without adopting a clear position in this subject. The aim of this thesis is to answer the question, which theory of the origin of the world Maimonides asserts, and why he retains both the idea of creation and eternity. It turns out that both positions, although not evident and unprovable, can lead to accurate conclusions in faith and philosophy. A possible answer to the question, which theory of the origin of the world Maimonides actually stands, it may be the argument that Maimonides holds both positions, because there is no contradiction for him.en_US
dc.languageČeštinacs_CZ
dc.language.isocs_CZ
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.titleMaimonides: věčný vs. stvořený světcs_CZ
dc.typebakalářská prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2010
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-09-15
dc.description.departmentInstitute of Philosophy and Religious Studiesen_US
dc.description.departmentÚstav filosofie a religionistikycs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Artsen_US
dc.description.facultyFilozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.identifier.repId81198
dc.title.translatedMaimonides: eternal vs. created universeen_US
dc.contributor.refereeNěmec, Václav
dc.identifier.aleph001382271
thesis.degree.nameBc.
thesis.degree.levelbakalářskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophyen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineFilozofiecs_CZ
thesis.degree.programPhilosophyen_US
thesis.degree.programFilozofiecs_CZ
uk.thesis.typebakalářská prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csFilozofická fakulta::Ústav filosofie a religionistikycs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Arts::Institute of Philosophy and Religious Studiesen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFilozofická fakultacs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Artsen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFFcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csFilozofiecs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enPhilosophyen_US
uk.degree-program.csFilozofiecs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enPhilosophyen_US
thesis.grade.csVelmi dobřecs_CZ
thesis.grade.enVery gooden_US
uk.abstract.csBakala.rski pnice analyzuje dva Maimonidovy pristupy k otazce po puvodu sveta, ktere se objevuji v jeho nejznamejsim filosofickem dile Pruvodce tapajicich. Maimonides uvadi argumenty jak pro teorii veenosti sveta, tak pro creatio ex nihilo, aniz by zaujal jednoznaene stanovisko. Cilem prace je zodpovedet otazku, jakou teorii 0 puvodu sveta Maimonides sam zastava a proe ve svem dUe ponechava v platnosti jak teze 0 stvofenosti sveta, tak teze 0 jeho vecnosti. Ukazuje se, ze oba postoje, pfestoze nejsou evidentni a jsou nedokazatelne, mohou vest ke korektnim zaverum v oblasti vfry a filozofie. Pffpadnou odpovedf na otazku, jakou teorii 0 puvodu sveta Maimonides vlastne zastava, pak muze by! i teze, ze Maimonides dd! obe pozice, protoze pro nej nepfedstavuji zadny vnitfnf rozpor.cs_CZ
uk.abstract.enIn this thesis are analyzed Maimonides's two approaches to the question about the origin of the world, appearing in his famous philosophical \vork The guide of the perplexed. Maimonides provides arguments for the theory of eternal universe and for creatio ex nihilo, without adopting a clear position in this subject. The aim of this thesis is to answer the question, which theory of the origin of the world Maimonides asserts, and why he retains both the idea of creation and eternity. It turns out that both positions, although not evident and unprovable, can lead to accurate conclusions in faith and philosophy. A possible answer to the question, which theory of the origin of the world Maimonides actually stands, it may be the argument that Maimonides holds both positions, because there is no contradiction for him.en_US
uk.publication.placePrahacs_CZ
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta, Ústav filosofie a religionistikycs_CZ
dc.identifier.lisID990013822710106986


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV