dc.contributor.advisor | Novotný, Karel | |
dc.creator | Held, Lukas Amadeus | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-20T09:24:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-20T09:24:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/34414 | |
dc.description.abstract | The object of our master-thesis is to draw a comparison between Michel Henry's phenomenology of life and Hans Blumenberg's philosophical anthropology, in order to show that both philosophies can enrichen each other and even solve some of the internal problems we will name and analyse. Several "classic" philosophical problems and questions will guide us through our argument: from esthetical and poetic questions, the problem of modern technology to a comparison of the phenomenology of Blumenberg and Henry. Finally, we will unify both standpoints to a new variation of phenomenology by trying to defend the thesis that Henrys phenomenology of life is ruled by an underlying anthropologism: Henry's "Vie" can only be understood as "human life", as "vie humaine". | en_US |
dc.language | German | cs_CZ |
dc.language.iso | de_DE | |
dc.publisher | Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta humanitních studií | cs_CZ |
dc.title | Der Mensch in Leben | de_DE |
dc.type | diplomová práce | cs_CZ |
dcterms.created | 2011 | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2011-06-22 | |
dc.description.department | Department of German and French Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description.department | Pracoviště oboru Německá a francouzská filozofie | cs_CZ |
dc.description.faculty | Fakulta humanitních studií | cs_CZ |
dc.description.faculty | Faculty of Humanities | en_US |
dc.identifier.repId | 110347 | |
dc.title.translated | Man in life | en_US |
dc.contributor.referee | Sepp, Hans Rainer | |
dc.identifier.aleph | 001460422 | |
thesis.degree.name | Mgr. | |
thesis.degree.level | navazující magisterské | cs_CZ |
thesis.degree.discipline | German and French Philosophy in the European context (EuroPhilosophy) | en_US |
thesis.degree.discipline | Německá a francouzská filozofie v Evropě (Eurofilozofie) | cs_CZ |
thesis.degree.program | Philosophy | en_US |
thesis.degree.program | Filozofie | cs_CZ |
uk.thesis.type | diplomová práce | cs_CZ |
uk.taxonomy.organization-cs | Fakulta humanitních studií::Pracoviště oboru Německá a francouzská filozofie | cs_CZ |
uk.taxonomy.organization-en | Faculty of Humanities::Department of German and French Philosophy | en_US |
uk.faculty-name.cs | Fakulta humanitních studií | cs_CZ |
uk.faculty-name.en | Faculty of Humanities | en_US |
uk.faculty-abbr.cs | FHS | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-discipline.cs | Německá a francouzská filozofie v Evropě (Eurofilozofie) | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-discipline.en | German and French Philosophy in the European context (EuroPhilosophy) | en_US |
uk.degree-program.cs | Filozofie | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-program.en | Philosophy | en_US |
thesis.grade.cs | Výborně | cs_CZ |
thesis.grade.en | Excellent | en_US |
uk.abstract.en | The object of our master-thesis is to draw a comparison between Michel Henry's phenomenology of life and Hans Blumenberg's philosophical anthropology, in order to show that both philosophies can enrichen each other and even solve some of the internal problems we will name and analyse. Several "classic" philosophical problems and questions will guide us through our argument: from esthetical and poetic questions, the problem of modern technology to a comparison of the phenomenology of Blumenberg and Henry. Finally, we will unify both standpoints to a new variation of phenomenology by trying to defend the thesis that Henrys phenomenology of life is ruled by an underlying anthropologism: Henry's "Vie" can only be understood as "human life", as "vie humaine". | en_US |
uk.file-availability | V | |
uk.grantor | Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta humanitních studií, Pracoviště oboru Německá a francouzská filozofie | cs_CZ |
thesis.grade.code | 1 | |
uk.publication-place | Praha | cs_CZ |
dc.identifier.lisID | 990014604220106986 | |