Show simple item record

Moc a odpadlictví: disputace v Barceloně v kontextu židovsko-křesťanských polemik 13. století
dc.contributor.advisorBoušek, Daniel
dc.creatorŽonca, Milan
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-20T08:20:40Z
dc.date.available2017-04-20T08:20:40Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/25485
dc.description.abstractThe present work examines the Barcelona disputation of 1263 between Namanides and Friar Paul Christian in the context of Jewish-Christian thirteenth-century polemics. The text considers far-reaching changes in Christian "hermeneutical image" of a Jew in the course of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and attempts to connect them with the deteriorating situation of western Jewry in that period. Analyzing the Barcelona disputation itself, this work concentrates on two most distinctive traits of thirteenth-century polemics: the activity of apostates and questioning the legitimacy of Jewish post-biblical textual and communal authorities. Looking closely at the ways these questions were addressed by the participants, it is suggested that internal Jewish issues, such as the quest for correct interpretation of Talmudic aggadah or power struggles for authority influenced, through the mediation of apostates like Paul Christian, the polemical methodology and anti-Jewish imagery of medieval Christians in that period. It also suggests that Namanides, on the other hand, was in his polemical narrative not only refuting Christian claims, but trying to offer a commentary on contemporary Jewish questions as well.en_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.titleAuthority and apostasy: the Barcelona disputation in the context of thirteenth-century Jewish-Christian polemicsen_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2009
dcterms.dateAccepted2009-09-24
dc.description.departmentInstitute of Philosophy and Religious Studiesen_US
dc.description.departmentÚstav filosofie a religionistikycs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Artsen_US
dc.description.facultyFilozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.identifier.repId75094
dc.title.translatedMoc a odpadlictví: disputace v Barceloně v kontextu židovsko-křesťanských polemik 13. stoletícs_CZ
dc.contributor.refereeLyčka, Milan
dc.identifier.aleph001197519
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelmagisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineHebraistika - Religionistikacs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineHebrew Studies - Religious Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.programHumanitní studiacs_CZ
thesis.degree.programHumanitiesen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFilozofická fakultacs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Artsen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFFcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csHebraistika - Religionistikacs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enHebrew Studies - Religious Studiesen_US
uk.degree-program.csHumanitní studiacs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enHumanitiesen_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.enThe present work examines the Barcelona disputation of 1263 between Namanides and Friar Paul Christian in the context of Jewish-Christian thirteenth-century polemics. The text considers far-reaching changes in Christian "hermeneutical image" of a Jew in the course of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, and attempts to connect them with the deteriorating situation of western Jewry in that period. Analyzing the Barcelona disputation itself, this work concentrates on two most distinctive traits of thirteenth-century polemics: the activity of apostates and questioning the legitimacy of Jewish post-biblical textual and communal authorities. Looking closely at the ways these questions were addressed by the participants, it is suggested that internal Jewish issues, such as the quest for correct interpretation of Talmudic aggadah or power struggles for authority influenced, through the mediation of apostates like Paul Christian, the polemical methodology and anti-Jewish imagery of medieval Christians in that period. It also suggests that Namanides, on the other hand, was in his polemical narrative not only refuting Christian claims, but trying to offer a commentary on contemporary Jewish questions as well.en_US
uk.publication-placePrahacs_CZ
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta, Ústav filosofie a religionistikycs_CZ


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 3-5, 116 36 Praha; email: dspace (at) is.cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV