Show simple item record

Mezi teorií a praxí: možnost afrického míru a sekuritizace evropské rozvojové politiky
dc.contributor.advisorRichard, Anne-Isabelle
dc.creatorSiebel, Lea Melody Pauline Ingeborg
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-17T11:51:26Z
dc.date.available2022-10-17T11:51:26Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/177622
dc.description.abstractThe African Peace Facility (APF), recently replaced by the European Peace Facility, was the EU's primary mechanism to fund African-led peace and security operations. The Facility introduced several changes to EU policy, including a new funding structure: The APF was financed by the European Development Fund, even though the Facility was ineligible as Official Development Assistance. This sparked a debate among policymakers and academic scholars about whether the APF has securitized EU development policy. However, many studies neglect the security-development nexus, which played a central role in the Facility. The thesis analyses securitizing practices which are distinct from the approach suggested by the classic securitization theory (i.e., the speech act). Through an in-depth analysis of primary and secondary sources, this thesis attempts to unpack the extent to which the APF securitized EU development policy. The analysis finds evidence of securitization but also of a developmentization of security policy, demonstrating how the Facility constantly oscillated between security and development and concludes that the APF embodied the securitydevelopment nexus. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)en_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.titleBetween theory and practice: The African Peace Facility and the securitization of EU development policyen_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2022
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-09-20
dc.description.departmentDepartment of European Studiesen_US
dc.description.departmentKatedra evropských studiícs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.repId248542
dc.title.translatedMezi teorií a praxí: možnost afrického míru a sekuritizace evropské rozvojové politikycs_CZ
dc.contributor.refereeKaragiannis, Yannis
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelnavazující magisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmeen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmecs_CZ
thesis.degree.programEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmeen_US
thesis.degree.programEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmecs_CZ
uk.thesis.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csFakulta sociálních věd::Katedra evropských studiícs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Social Sciences::Department of European Studiesen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFSVcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmecs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmeen_US
uk.degree-program.csEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmecs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enEuropean Politics and Society: Vaclav Havel Joint Master Programmeen_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.enThe African Peace Facility (APF), recently replaced by the European Peace Facility, was the EU's primary mechanism to fund African-led peace and security operations. The Facility introduced several changes to EU policy, including a new funding structure: The APF was financed by the European Development Fund, even though the Facility was ineligible as Official Development Assistance. This sparked a debate among policymakers and academic scholars about whether the APF has securitized EU development policy. However, many studies neglect the security-development nexus, which played a central role in the Facility. The thesis analyses securitizing practices which are distinct from the approach suggested by the classic securitization theory (i.e., the speech act). Through an in-depth analysis of primary and secondary sources, this thesis attempts to unpack the extent to which the APF securitized EU development policy. The analysis finds evidence of securitization but also of a developmentization of security policy, demonstrating how the Facility constantly oscillated between security and development and concludes that the APF embodied the securitydevelopment nexus. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)en_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Katedra evropských studiícs_CZ
thesis.grade.codeB
uk.publication-placePrahacs_CZ
uk.thesis.defenceStatusO


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV