Show simple item record

Buck-passing: Teoretický ráme a případové studie Mnichovské krize a Korojeské války
dc.contributor.advisorKofroň, Jan
dc.creatorWen, Tai-Yun
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-14T17:53:14Z
dc.date.available2022-04-14T17:53:14Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/171861
dc.description.abstractBuck-passing, an increasingly prominent concept to explain states' foreign policy, suffers from inconsistency in both theory and application. This thesis proposes a revised theoretical framework of buck-passing, which is established on the distinguishment of three images of buck-passing-intent, action, and outcome. The conceptualization of buck-passing, in contrast to other strategies, should center the image of outcome because buck-passing is a strategy that intrinsically involves three parties, and its outcome cannot be fulfilled unilaterally. The revised framework also challenges the traditional consensus that no buck-passing occurs under bipolarity, arguing that the regional great power is possible to stop a superpower's aggression in a limited war. In the case of the Munich Crisis, the involved great powers, except for bandwagoning Italy, adopted the buck- passing strategy at the end, leading to the signature of the Munich Agreement as the outcome of appeasement, where no collective good as checking aggression was provided. In the case of the Korean War, while facing the US aggression in a bipolar world, although the Soviet Union refused to engage in, China caught the buck and militarily intervened in the Korean Peninsula. The discrepancy between the Chinese and the Soviet policies was...en_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.subjectBuck-passingen_US
dc.subjectMunich Agreementen_US
dc.subjectKorean Waren_US
dc.subjectThree-party Interactionen_US
dc.subjectRealismen_US
dc.titleBuck-passing: A Theoretical Framework and Case Studies on the Munich Crisis and the Korean Waren_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2022
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-24
dc.description.departmentKatedra politologiecs_CZ
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Political Scienceen_US
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
dc.description.facultyFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.identifier.repId236143
dc.title.translatedBuck-passing: Teoretický ráme a případové studie Mnichovské krize a Korojeské válkycs_CZ
dc.contributor.refereeRomancov, Michael
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelnavazující magisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineGeopolitická studiacs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineGeopolitical Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.programGeopolitical Studiescs_CZ
thesis.degree.programGeopolitical Studiesen_US
uk.thesis.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csFakulta sociálních věd::Katedra politologiecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Social Sciences::Department of Political Scienceen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFSVcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csGeopolitická studiacs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enGeopolitical Studiesen_US
uk.degree-program.csGeopolitical Studiescs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enGeopolitical Studiesen_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.enBuck-passing, an increasingly prominent concept to explain states' foreign policy, suffers from inconsistency in both theory and application. This thesis proposes a revised theoretical framework of buck-passing, which is established on the distinguishment of three images of buck-passing-intent, action, and outcome. The conceptualization of buck-passing, in contrast to other strategies, should center the image of outcome because buck-passing is a strategy that intrinsically involves three parties, and its outcome cannot be fulfilled unilaterally. The revised framework also challenges the traditional consensus that no buck-passing occurs under bipolarity, arguing that the regional great power is possible to stop a superpower's aggression in a limited war. In the case of the Munich Crisis, the involved great powers, except for bandwagoning Italy, adopted the buck- passing strategy at the end, leading to the signature of the Munich Agreement as the outcome of appeasement, where no collective good as checking aggression was provided. In the case of the Korean War, while facing the US aggression in a bipolar world, although the Soviet Union refused to engage in, China caught the buck and militarily intervened in the Korean Peninsula. The discrepancy between the Chinese and the Soviet policies was...en_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Katedra politologiecs_CZ
thesis.grade.codeA
uk.publication-placePrahacs_CZ
uk.thesis.defenceStatusO


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV