Show simple item record

Hospodářské politiky a volba na straně povstalců: komparativní analýza Libye, Sýrie a Jemenu
dc.contributor.advisorKarásek, Tomáš
dc.creatorIppoliti, Beatrice Maria Luna
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-13T09:06:20Z
dc.date.available2021-10-13T09:06:20Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/151557
dc.description.abstractIn modern history governments have had an active role in responding and influencing the economic circumstances of the state. Whether by allocating resources or administering reforms, peacetime economic policies have traditionally impacted actor's public support as the choice of policy can impact the perception of actor's legitimacy. Despite the plethora of competing definitions, political scientists agree on considering legitimacy as a basic condition of governance -as it entails the acceptance and commitment of a people to a political authority. Rather than a unique characteristic of the state, governance becomes an attribute belonging to any social arrangement that exercises "function of statehood". By focusing on the comparison between the Syrian, the Libyan, and the Yemeni civil war this thesis aim is to enquire whether a positive relationship can be assessed between government economic choices and rebel's legitimacy. Given the neopatrimonial character of the three states this dissertation will focus on the actor's economic behavior to assess legitimacy. For the purpose of this analysis, I have chosen to adopt an Elitist framework as it focuses on bargain dynamics between political actors and elites (or constituencies). The methodological approach utilized is that of a comparative case study.en_US
dc.languageEnglishcs_CZ
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.subjectCivil Waren_US
dc.subjectEconomic Policiesen_US
dc.subjectRebel Governanceen_US
dc.subjectSelectorate Theoryen_US
dc.subjectComparative Case Studiesen_US
dc.subjectLegitimacyen_US
dc.subjectNeopatrimonialismen_US
dc.titleEconomic Policies and Rebel Choices: A Comparative Perspective on Libya, Syria and Yemenen_US
dc.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
dcterms.created2021
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-09-22
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Security Studiesen_US
dc.description.departmentKatedra bezpečnostních studiícs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.repId233691
dc.title.translatedHospodářské politiky a volba na straně povstalců: komparativní analýza Libye, Sýrie a Jemenucs_CZ
dc.contributor.refereeLaryš, Martin
thesis.degree.nameMgr.
thesis.degree.levelnavazující magisterskécs_CZ
thesis.degree.disciplineInternational Security Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineMezinárodní bezpečnostní studiacs_CZ
thesis.degree.programPolitologiecs_CZ
thesis.degree.programPolitical Scienceen_US
uk.thesis.typediplomová prácecs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-csFakulta sociálních věd::Katedra bezpečnostních studiícs_CZ
uk.taxonomy.organization-enFaculty of Social Sciences::Department of Security Studiesen_US
uk.faculty-name.csFakulta sociálních vědcs_CZ
uk.faculty-name.enFaculty of Social Sciencesen_US
uk.faculty-abbr.csFSVcs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.csMezinárodní bezpečnostní studiacs_CZ
uk.degree-discipline.enInternational Security Studiesen_US
uk.degree-program.csPolitologiecs_CZ
uk.degree-program.enPolitical Scienceen_US
thesis.grade.csVýborněcs_CZ
thesis.grade.enExcellenten_US
uk.abstract.enIn modern history governments have had an active role in responding and influencing the economic circumstances of the state. Whether by allocating resources or administering reforms, peacetime economic policies have traditionally impacted actor's public support as the choice of policy can impact the perception of actor's legitimacy. Despite the plethora of competing definitions, political scientists agree on considering legitimacy as a basic condition of governance -as it entails the acceptance and commitment of a people to a political authority. Rather than a unique characteristic of the state, governance becomes an attribute belonging to any social arrangement that exercises "function of statehood". By focusing on the comparison between the Syrian, the Libyan, and the Yemeni civil war this thesis aim is to enquire whether a positive relationship can be assessed between government economic choices and rebel's legitimacy. Given the neopatrimonial character of the three states this dissertation will focus on the actor's economic behavior to assess legitimacy. For the purpose of this analysis, I have chosen to adopt an Elitist framework as it focuses on bargain dynamics between political actors and elites (or constituencies). The methodological approach utilized is that of a comparative case study.en_US
uk.file-availabilityV
uk.grantorUniverzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Katedra bezpečnostních studiícs_CZ
thesis.grade.codeB
uk.publication-placePrahacs_CZ
uk.thesis.defenceStatusO


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV