dc.contributor.advisor | Karásek, Tomáš | |
dc.creator | Westenberger, Kay Louise | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-25T10:04:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-25T10:04:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/107888 | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis analyses Germany's commitment to multilateral military operations. Following the research question why Germany participates in some multilateral military operations but not in others, Germany's respective decision-making process regarding troop deployment in the DR Congo in 2006 on one hand and military non-engagement in Libya 2011 on the other hand is traced. By contrasting the concept of strategic culture with a purely rational assessment of the factors of alliance politics, risk-analysis and military feasibility of the operations, the decisiveness of taking into account Germany's strategic culture to explain deployment decisions is stressed. Neither is there a lack of external pressure for German military participation in the case of Libya, nor is the military operation in the DR Congo decisively less risky or militarily more feasible. Rather, Germany's multilateral and anti- militaristic strategic cultural strands affect its decision-making. Next to demanding a thorough justification and legitimization of any military engagement, two red lines for military deployment can be identified. First, Germany refuses to act unilaterally and displays a high reluctance towards military engagement outside the multilateral framework of the UN, NATO or EU. Secondly, Germany rejects to engage in... | en_US |
dc.language | English | cs_CZ |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd | cs_CZ |
dc.subject | Germany | en_US |
dc.subject | strategic culture | en_US |
dc.subject | EUFOR RD Congo | en_US |
dc.subject | Libya | en_US |
dc.subject | military deployment abroad | en_US |
dc.subject | political decision-making | en_US |
dc.subject | process tracing | en_US |
dc.subject | foreign and security policy | en_US |
dc.title | Germany's commitment to CSDP operations: comparing the cases of the DRC and Libya | en_US |
dc.type | diplomová práce | cs_CZ |
dcterms.created | 2019 | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-06-20 | |
dc.description.department | Katedra bezpečnostních studií | cs_CZ |
dc.description.department | Department of Security Studies | en_US |
dc.description.faculty | Faculty of Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.faculty | Fakulta sociálních věd | cs_CZ |
dc.identifier.repId | 202862 | |
dc.title.translated | Angažovanost Německa v operacích SBOP: srovnání misí v Demokratické republice Kongo a Libyi | cs_CZ |
dc.contributor.referee | Beneš, Jan | |
dc.identifier.aleph | 002284123 | |
thesis.degree.name | Mgr. | |
thesis.degree.level | navazující magisterské | cs_CZ |
thesis.degree.discipline | Mezinárodní bezpečnostní studia | cs_CZ |
thesis.degree.discipline | International Security Studies | en_US |
thesis.degree.program | Political Science | en_US |
thesis.degree.program | Politologie | cs_CZ |
uk.thesis.type | diplomová práce | cs_CZ |
uk.taxonomy.organization-cs | Fakulta sociálních věd::Katedra bezpečnostních studií | cs_CZ |
uk.taxonomy.organization-en | Faculty of Social Sciences::Department of Security Studies | en_US |
uk.faculty-name.cs | Fakulta sociálních věd | cs_CZ |
uk.faculty-name.en | Faculty of Social Sciences | en_US |
uk.faculty-abbr.cs | FSV | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-discipline.cs | Mezinárodní bezpečnostní studia | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-discipline.en | International Security Studies | en_US |
uk.degree-program.cs | Politologie | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-program.en | Political Science | en_US |
thesis.grade.cs | Výborně | cs_CZ |
thesis.grade.en | Excellent | en_US |
uk.abstract.en | This thesis analyses Germany's commitment to multilateral military operations. Following the research question why Germany participates in some multilateral military operations but not in others, Germany's respective decision-making process regarding troop deployment in the DR Congo in 2006 on one hand and military non-engagement in Libya 2011 on the other hand is traced. By contrasting the concept of strategic culture with a purely rational assessment of the factors of alliance politics, risk-analysis and military feasibility of the operations, the decisiveness of taking into account Germany's strategic culture to explain deployment decisions is stressed. Neither is there a lack of external pressure for German military participation in the case of Libya, nor is the military operation in the DR Congo decisively less risky or militarily more feasible. Rather, Germany's multilateral and anti- militaristic strategic cultural strands affect its decision-making. Next to demanding a thorough justification and legitimization of any military engagement, two red lines for military deployment can be identified. First, Germany refuses to act unilaterally and displays a high reluctance towards military engagement outside the multilateral framework of the UN, NATO or EU. Secondly, Germany rejects to engage in... | en_US |
uk.file-availability | V | |
uk.grantor | Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Katedra bezpečnostních studií | cs_CZ |
thesis.grade.code | A | |
uk.publication-place | Praha | cs_CZ |
dc.identifier.lisID | 990022841230106986 | |