Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEngisch, Patrik
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-02T10:15:13Z
dc.date.available2019-05-02T10:15:13Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2571-0915
dc.identifier.issn0014-1291
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/105818
dc.description.abstractKathleen Stock has recently argued that Gregory Currie’s account of fiction is beset by two patchwork puzzles. According to the first, Currie’s account entails that works of fiction end up being implausible heterogenous complexes of utterances that furnish a fictional world and utterances that aim at representing the actual world. According to the second, competent engagement with a fiction can implausibly result in switching from one mental attitude to another – namely, belief and make-belief. In this paper, I argue for two main claims. First, that a few alterations to Currie’s account make it immune to Stock’s puzzles. And, second, that such a modified account presents clear advantages over the alternative one offered by Stock.en_US
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourceEstetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics, 2019, 1, 28-47cs_CZ
dc.source.urihttp://aesthetics.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subjectfictionen_US
dc.subjectfictional worlden_US
dc.subjectworlds of fictionen_US
dc.subjectaesthetic experienceen_US
dc.subjectCurrie G.en_US
dc.titlePatchwork Puzzles and the Nature of Fictionen_US
dc.typeVědecký článekcs_CZ
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US
uk.abstract.enKathleen Stock has recently argued that Gregory Currie’s account of fiction is beset by two patchwork puzzles. According to the first, Currie’s account entails that works of fiction end up being implausible heterogenous complexes of utterances that furnish a fictional world and utterances that aim at representing the actual world. According to the second, competent engagement with a fiction can implausibly result in switching from one mental attitude to another – namely, belief and make-belief. In this paper, I argue for two main claims. First, that a few alterations to Currie’s account make it immune to Stock’s puzzles. And, second, that such a modified account presents clear advantages over the alternative one offered by Stock.cs_CZ
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage28
dc.description.endPage47
dcterms.isPartOf.nameEstetika: The Central European Journal of Aestheticscs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2019
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume2019
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV