Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMelichar, Bohumil
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-16T09:43:39Z
dc.date.available2019-01-16T09:43:39Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2336-6710
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/104474
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourcePrager wirtschafts- und sozialhistorische Mitteilungen - Prague Economic and Social History Papers, 2018, 27, 1, 94-120cs_CZ
dc.source.urihttps://wisohim.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subjectCommunist Partycs_CZ
dc.subjectCzechoslovakiacs_CZ
dc.subjectGreat Britaincs_CZ
dc.subjectInterwar Periodcs_CZ
dc.titleKarlín and Kings Road: Two Different Worlds. A Comparison of the Political Success of Communist Party of Czechoslovakia and Communist Party of Great Britain between the World Warscs_CZ
dc.typeVědecký článekcs_CZ
uk.abstract.enThe study gives a comparative analysis of Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) and Communist Party of Czechoslovakia (CPC), which were chosen as unique examples of success and failure of national sections of Communist international among interwar Europe. The aim of the submitted research is to explain the paradoxical success of CPC sharply contrasted with the marginalization of CPGB. Historical fact that communists ideas were much less popular in Great Britain, a country with the highly developed capitalist system, than in a young Czechoslovak republic, completely turns over the expectations based on the classical texts of Marxist philosophers. The comparison of the organizational evolution of CPGB and CPC, their integration to the national political systems and possibilities of delegitimizations of symbolic pillars of British and Czechoslovak society can stress the causes of stability or instability of societies, in which these branches of communist movement worked. The inquiry that analyzes side by side the impact of two-party and multi-party political system, the role of social implication of open world of empire and small linguistic closed nation, a monarchy and president office as symbols of political and social stability can explore a new perspective on the research of the broad topic of interwar communist movement. Chosen type of individualizing comparison analysis put differences above consistent features in the attempt to highlight causes of openness of Czechoslovak society to the radical left ideology of Marxism-Leninism in the examined era.cs_CZ
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage94
dc.description.endPage120
dcterms.isPartOf.namePrager wirtschafts- und sozialhistorische Mitteilungen - Prague Economic and Social History Paperscs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2018
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume27
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV