Show simple item record

Anaphoric function of the demonstrative ten in grammaticalization perspective
dc.contributor.authorZíková, Magdalena
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-28T15:02:13Z
dc.date.available2018-11-28T15:02:13Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2336-6702
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/103951
dc.publisherUniverzita Karlova, Filozofická fakultacs_CZ
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
dc.sourceStudie z aplikované lingvistiky - Studies in Applied Linguistics, 2018, 9, Special Issue, 106-123cs_CZ
dc.source.urihttps://studiezaplikovanelingvistiky.ff.cuni.cz
dc.subjectdemonstrative 'ten'cs_CZ
dc.subjectanaphoric usecs_CZ
dc.subjectnarrative discoursecs_CZ
dc.subjectgrammaticalizationcs_CZ
dc.subjecttheme–rheme structurecs_CZ
dc.subjectdemonstrativum tencs_CZ
dc.subjectanaforická funkcecs_CZ
dc.subjectnarativní diskurscs_CZ
dc.subjectgramatikalizacecs_CZ
dc.subjectaktuální členěnícs_CZ
dc.titleAnaforická funkce výrazu ten v gramatikalizační perspektivěcs_CZ
dc.title.alternativeAnaphoric function of the demonstrative ten in grammaticalization perspectivecs_CZ
dc.typeVědecký článekcs_CZ
uk.abstract.enIn the paper, the anaphoric use of the demonstrative ten in spoken narrative discourse is examined. Two questions are of main concern to the study: (i) frequency and contextual distribution of the demonstrative, and (ii) grammaticalization potential of the demonstrative in anaphoric function. Concerning (i), all nominal phrases containing the demonstrative ten (determined NPs; 230 in total) are contrasted with their non-determined lexical counterparts, i.e. those not containing the demonstrative (bare NPs; 400 in total). Each item is then inspected in terms of a set of linguistic parameters. It turns out that determined NPs dominate over the bared NPs in the data — speakers use them in more than 60 % of repeated mentions. The most decisive factors are animacy of the referent and sentence perspective (theme — rheme structure). In this way, two functions are identified in the anaphoric use: (i) contextualizing, and (ii) strongly demonstrative, none of which seems to be a plausible source of potential grammaticalization of the demonstrative into a definite article.cs_CZ
uk.internal-typeuk_publication
dc.description.startPage106
dc.description.endPage123
dcterms.isPartOf.nameStudie z aplikované lingvistiky - Studies in Applied Linguisticscs_CZ
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2018
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume9
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssueSpecial Issue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/

© 2017 Univerzita Karlova, Ústřední knihovna, Ovocný trh 560/5, 116 36 Praha 1; email: admin-repozitar [at] cuni.cz

Za dodržení všech ustanovení autorského zákona jsou zodpovědné jednotlivé složky Univerzity Karlovy. / Each constituent part of Charles University is responsible for adherence to all provisions of the copyright law.

Upozornění / Notice: Získané informace nemohou být použity k výdělečným účelům nebo vydávány za studijní, vědeckou nebo jinou tvůrčí činnost jiné osoby než autora. / Any retrieved information shall not be used for any commercial purposes or claimed as results of studying, scientific or any other creative activities of any person other than the author.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Theme by 
@mire NV