dc.contributor.advisor | Kučera, Tomáš | |
dc.creator | Clapton, Lawrie | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-21T23:02:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-21T23:02:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/101887 | |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation examines the authors and conflicts which inspired and influenced modern perceptions of 'insurgency' and 'counterinsurgency'. We trace this process through the lineage of Western counterinsurgency proposed by US Field Manual 3-24, examining three authors' experiences of insurgency which have been crucial in the formation of FM 3- 24's doctrine of counterinsurgency: T.E. Lawrence's theory of insurgency drawn from the Arab Revolt (1917); David Galula's doctrine of counterinsurgency, from the French-Algerian War (1954-1962), and Robert Thompson's doctrine of counterinsurgency, from the British Malay Emergency (1948-1960). These three authors have had a substantial influence upon modern doctrine and are key examples of historical 'solutions' to insurgency. As such, each author presents, assumes, and promulgates a perspective of insurgency, which has proven influential to modern discourse. In tracing this history, we trace the imposition of Western structures of political, moral, and military power upon a marginalised ulterior, and the effort made by these structures to subdue and control this ulterior. Reliance upon these accounts by modern doctrine has encouraged the development of a dichotomy between insurgency and counterinsurgency, in which insurgency is integrally subversive,... | en_US |
dc.language | English | cs_CZ |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd | cs_CZ |
dc.title | Anatomy of Insurgency: Trancing the History of "Insurgency" in Military Doctrine | en_US |
dc.type | diplomová práce | cs_CZ |
dcterms.created | 2018 | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2018-09-13 | |
dc.description.department | Department of Security Studies | en_US |
dc.description.department | Katedra bezpečnostních studií | cs_CZ |
dc.description.faculty | Fakulta sociálních věd | cs_CZ |
dc.description.faculty | Faculty of Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.identifier.repId | 202683 | |
dc.title.translated | Poučení se ze zpravodajského selhání v britské vojenské strategii | cs_CZ |
dc.contributor.referee | Střítecký, Vít | |
dc.identifier.aleph | 002202359 | |
thesis.degree.name | Mgr. | |
thesis.degree.level | navazující magisterské | cs_CZ |
thesis.degree.discipline | Mezinárodní bezpečnostní studia | cs_CZ |
thesis.degree.discipline | International Security Studies | en_US |
thesis.degree.program | Politologie | cs_CZ |
thesis.degree.program | Political Science | en_US |
uk.thesis.type | diplomová práce | cs_CZ |
uk.taxonomy.organization-cs | Fakulta sociálních věd::Katedra bezpečnostních studií | cs_CZ |
uk.taxonomy.organization-en | Faculty of Social Sciences::Department of Security Studies | en_US |
uk.faculty-name.cs | Fakulta sociálních věd | cs_CZ |
uk.faculty-name.en | Faculty of Social Sciences | en_US |
uk.faculty-abbr.cs | FSV | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-discipline.cs | Mezinárodní bezpečnostní studia | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-discipline.en | International Security Studies | en_US |
uk.degree-program.cs | Politologie | cs_CZ |
uk.degree-program.en | Political Science | en_US |
thesis.grade.cs | Výborně | cs_CZ |
thesis.grade.en | Excellent | en_US |
uk.abstract.en | This dissertation examines the authors and conflicts which inspired and influenced modern perceptions of 'insurgency' and 'counterinsurgency'. We trace this process through the lineage of Western counterinsurgency proposed by US Field Manual 3-24, examining three authors' experiences of insurgency which have been crucial in the formation of FM 3- 24's doctrine of counterinsurgency: T.E. Lawrence's theory of insurgency drawn from the Arab Revolt (1917); David Galula's doctrine of counterinsurgency, from the French-Algerian War (1954-1962), and Robert Thompson's doctrine of counterinsurgency, from the British Malay Emergency (1948-1960). These three authors have had a substantial influence upon modern doctrine and are key examples of historical 'solutions' to insurgency. As such, each author presents, assumes, and promulgates a perspective of insurgency, which has proven influential to modern discourse. In tracing this history, we trace the imposition of Western structures of political, moral, and military power upon a marginalised ulterior, and the effort made by these structures to subdue and control this ulterior. Reliance upon these accounts by modern doctrine has encouraged the development of a dichotomy between insurgency and counterinsurgency, in which insurgency is integrally subversive,... | en_US |
uk.file-availability | V | |
uk.grantor | Univerzita Karlova, Fakulta sociálních věd, Katedra bezpečnostních studií | cs_CZ |
thesis.grade.code | A | |
uk.publication-place | Praha | cs_CZ |
dc.identifier.lisID | 990022023590106986 | |