<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Ročník 2018</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/109918</link>
<description>Volume 2018</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 23:02:24 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T23:02:24Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Do zámoří s Austro-Americanou</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/111186</link>
<description>Do zámoří s Austro-Americanou
Boček, Martin
Shipping in the Habsburg Monarchy is closely related to the two Austrian shipping overseas companies,
one of which was Austro-Americana. This shipping company was founded in the late 19th century, but
quickly settled with other shipping companies on the European continent, despite the fact that the
company did not receive such large financial subsidies as the second Austrian company Österreichischer
Lloyd. Thanks to the established shipping lines to North American ports, especially to New York, the
company soon began to focus on the transport of migrants from various European countries, mainly
from Austria-Hungary, and could also build large steamboats designed for migration transport.
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/111186</guid>
<dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>K personální politice Viléma II. v německých a pruských ozbrojených silách</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/111184</link>
<description>K personální politice Viléma II. v německých a pruských ozbrojených silách
Stellner, František
The study analyses the influence of Wilhelm II, German Emperor on the personnel policy in the
armed forces between 1888–1918. It also describes the most crucial events in connection with the
level of institutions of the Empire and highest Prussian institutions. The study looks for main actors
of individual appointments and examines who was instrumental in key personnel appointments.
The study’s conclusions are primarily based on analysing non-published sources from the Geheimes
Staatsarchiv Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Berlin-Dahlem, namely the Brandenburg-Preußisches Hausarchiv, Repositur 53, Kaiser Wilhelm II. und Familie. It is also based on reports of Austrian-Hungarian ambassadors in Berlin saved in the Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv, Wien, namely Abteilung III.
(Preußen). The author concludes that Wilhelm II’s personnel policy had three stages of development.
At the beginning of his rule, he excitedly grasped the chance to “rejuvenate” the corps of generals of
the armed forces and to surround himself with people who suited him — people who admired him,
did not criticize him, and did not argue with him. From this perspective, he negatively influenced
the state of the armed forces because (unlike his predecessors) he focused more on subjective factors
rather than objective criteria when assessing the abilities of the members of the armed forces. After
1900, the second stage began, during which the Emperor accepted suggestions for promotions. The
third stage — the significant decline of the Emperor’s influence on the personnel policy of armed
forces — started after the scandals in 1907 and after the beginning of World War I. Wilhelm II’s influence on the personnel policy of armed forces can be (similarly to his influence on foreign and internal policies) described as chaotic, unsystematic, and in some instances even destructive, which
is why he is partly responsible for the developments during World War I, including the takeover of
political decisions by the leaders of the armed forces.
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/111184</guid>
<dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Zrod a vývoj japonského imperialismu</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/111182</link>
<description>Zrod a vývoj japonského imperialismu
Kodet, Roman
Japanese imperialism was an important factor of the policy in the Far East in the first half of the
20th century. Due to its victories in the First Sino-Japanese War and the Russo-Japanese war, Japan
obtained a considerable empire on the Asian mainland. In this step it followed as the only Asian
nation the European imperial countries. Japanese imperialism is therefore sometimes considered as
an extension of the European one. On the other hand, Japanese overseas expansion was motivated by
quite different reasons — especially by an effort to ensure national security. It also used completely
different rhetoric of Pan-Asianism and anti-colonialism. The building of empire was perceived
differently than the same process in European countries. The shape of Japanese imperialism was
therefore quite distinct and had a completely different legacy as in the case of Europe.
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/111182</guid>
<dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pokus o regionální politiku v období mezi válkami na příkladu Hlučínska a Štýrska</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/111180</link>
<description>Pokus o regionální politiku v období mezi válkami na příkladu Hlučínska a Štýrska
Kremr, Tomáš
This article deals with the development of the regional policy of two successor states after the
break-up of Austria-Hungary — after the First World War. At that time, regional policy, as we know
it from the present time, did not exist, but after the First World War, the economic situation in crisis
periods (post-war reconstruction, the world economic crisis) required governmental intervention.
</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/111180</guid>
<dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
